Alex Shinn scripsit: > No, you're really not understanding. The entire premise of the > module system is that the library declarations and Scheme code live > in two fundamentally different spaces. You can import bindings like > `import', `export' and `include' from libraries in any order and they > won't conflict with the existing library declarations.
That's the theory, yes. But there's nothing to prevent implementers from doing things slightly differently. One thing I have learned in this process is that (excepting Chibi, which is made for the purpose) there is no such thing as a 100% compliant implementation of any Scheme standard. -- A few times, I did some exuberant stomping about, John Cowan like a hippo auditioning for Riverdance, though [email protected] I stopped when I thought I heard something at http://ccil.org/~cowan the far side of the room falling over in rhythm with my feet. --Joseph Zitt _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
