This is a Formal Response to Formal Comment #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
The editors rejected this request as too late and unlikely to survive a ballot. It is trivial to redefine `if` to work this way. If you are dissatisfied with this Formal Response, please let us know. Thank you for participating in the R7RS process. -- John Cowan [email protected] http://ccil.org/~cowan It's the old, old story. Droid meets droid. Droid becomes chameleon. Droid loses chameleon, chameleon becomes blob, droid gets blob back again. It's a classic tale. --Kryten, Red Dwarf _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
