On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 2:47 PM, John Cowan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Specifically, suppose Kawa implements R7RS as far as we can. > > Just so. In that case, providing "r7rs" would be a Good Thing. > Still, it would be a disservice to provide it in an implementation that didn't support tail recursion, for example, since that's a basic feature of the language and many programs won't work without it. It would be better to agree on a feature identifier that such languages can support. This can be outside the spec, for example in an SRFI.
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
