Hi, In draft 7, in section 7.1.1, <non-digit> is <dot subsequent> | <explicit sign>. However, an <explicit sign> is also a <dot subsequent>, so it seems that <non-digit> is unnecessary. Given that its only use is in <peculiar identifier>, which also mentions <dot subsequent>, could <non-digit> be eliminated to clarify that two choices from <peculiar identifier> differ only by the inclusion of an <explicit sign>?
| <explicit sign> . <dot subsequent> <subsequent>* | . <non-digit> <subsequent>* instead becomes | <explicit sign> . <dot subsequent> <subsequent>* | . <dot subsequent> <subsequent>* Of course, <non-digit> would also be a perfectly good name for the collapsed nonterminal. - David Adler _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
