On Wed, Nov 14 2012, Alex Shinn wrote: > In Section 5.2 says that a REPL should permit to redefine existing > definitions. What should happen if a record definition is redefined? > Should existing record instances be considered instances of the new > type? > > Again, implementations differ here so there's not much > we can say. Smalltalk-style class redefinition is a nice > feature, but fragile and not currently widely implemented.
You can say what "should" happen. Helmut _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
