On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Helmut Eller <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14 2012, Marc Feeley wrote: > > > That's > > the wrong thing to optimize... if implementation difficulty is a > > concern we will soon get rid of continuations, the REPL, and maybe > > closures and garbage collection. > > If implementation difficulty where a concern we would get rid of > hygienic macros first. Oh wait, Gambit doesn't even have hygienic > macros. ;-) > Haven't used Gambit for years, save for testing system compatibility, so I may be wrong, but I thought that '-:s' added hygenic macro support via an extension. > Helmut > > _______________________________________________ > Scheme-reports mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports > -- ==== Q. How many Prolog programmers does it take to change a lightbulb? A. No.
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
