On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Steve Hafner <[email protected]>wrote:

> Here are a few minor comments on R7RS, draft 7:
>
> Page 8 it says "None of the identifiers defined in this report contain
> upper-case characters, even when they appear to do so as a result of
> the English-language convention of capitalizing the first word of a
> sentence."  The second clause "even when they ...." seems an odd thing
> to tax the reader with. Pages 27 and 47 are the only places I see
> where identifiers actually begin a sentence, and in these cases none
> of the identifiers are capitalized. Nor should they be capitalized, as
> Scheme grammar should take precedence over English grammar. Perhaps
> better would be to rephrase the sentences so that identifiers never
> begin a sentence.
>

Thanks.  I've done the rephrasing you suggest over time, but some mistakes
must have crept in.  I'll fix those soon.  I've left the sentence on page 8
in place partly in case I missed one of those mistakes.


> IEEE 754-2008 is mentioned a number of times, but no reference is given.
>

You're right.  We reference IEEE Standard 754-1985 (item #19 in the
bibliograph), but should update that to IEEE Standard 754-2008.


> Page 80, "Additional Material": Why not give http://www.r7rs.org/  as
> the sole reference, which can list other sites as they come and go.
> Also, I would guess that www.r7rs.org will be the place for errata,
> which seems an important thing to draw the readers attention to.
> Additionally, all the examples on page 81 could be removed from the
> report and placed on www.r7rs.org. Other examples could be added to
> the site by the Scheme community.
>

Even if references can come and go, it's good for a standards document to
represent a moment in time so as to establish context, among other things.
 I do agree that there should also be a web site, and that setting up
http://www.r7rs.org/ is a good idea.  However, there are already volunteers
maintaining http://schemers.org/, and doing a good job of it, so we've
chosen to include that site.
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports

Reply via email to