On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Alex Shinn <[email protected]> wrote:
> That to me means the effect of the with-exception-handler >> is to raise an exception handled by some top-level handler. >> However, the example says the expression evaluates to <unspecified> >> - i.e. it should actually return. >> > > Yes, that's what will happen - I'll fix that. > Dont miss the line on the next page. "After printing, the second example then raises another ex- ception." My understanding is that it will not return. Has this changed in any way in R7RS from how R6RS and SRFI-34 works? Cheers leppie -- http://codeplex.com/IronScheme http://xacc.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
