On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 7:19 AM, John Cowan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mark H Weaver scripsit: > > > My point is that your ComplexRepresentation page states that Guile and > > Racket do not support complex numbers of mixed exactness, but that's not > > quite true. There is one important special case of mixed exactness that > > *is* supported in Guile, Racket, Ikarus, and perhaps others. > > In that case, *every* Scheme that supports inexact reals at all, a priori > supports complex numbers of mixed exactness such that the imag-part is 0. > I love this reasoning. So every Scheme supports mixed exactness quaternions. What a progressive language. -- Alex
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
