Hi, I just finished reading through draft 8. In general it is OK and I could live with it. Some parts are done very well, and most are acceptable. I did find a few typographical things and related possibilities for editorial improvements. There are a couple of semantic concerns I had as well.
I don't expect there to be any significant changes to the document, but I did think it would be worthwhile to at least report concerns about features added later in the r7rs process, repeat older concerns, and provide other general and specific reactions. This is all very much in the spirit of "take it as you will" -- if it makes the WG change the document in some way, great, and if not that's OK too. I'll reply on specific points to clarify my perspective if needed but I don't feel the need to go into long threads. OK, specific things coming in other mails. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
