The wishy-washiness regarding whether introduced identifiers get renamed or not is pretty bad. It means that a macro expanding to a definition and references to that definition will work differently at the top level and internally, depending on the implementation -- surely not a good thing. I recognize that the problem is tricky and there's a lot of practice out there, but the R6RS situation is better.
The penultimate para of the intro should transpose the references and the period. The `when' example for let-syntax is not so good, now that `when' is in scheme. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
