On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Andy Wingo <[email protected]> wrote: > I've said it before but it's worth repeating: "guard" is not a good > error handling construct.
Perhaps not, but it's what R6RS provides, and with-exception-handler is much too low-level. I think people should provide alternatives to guard in SRFIs and/or the large language, and maybe we can replace guard in R8RS. -- Alex
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
