On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Andy Wingo <[email protected]> wrote: > I know it's been up for a vote, but I think the WG went past > "consistency" to "foolish consistency" as regards string-map, > string-for-each, etc. They seem singularly useless to me.
Agreed, but it's not a bug and we're not going to bother re-voting on this. > I very much prefer the R6RS `map' to the SRFI-1 `map' as regards > multiple lists. > I disagree, and preferences aside SRFI-1 is far more widely used than R6RS. -- Alex
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
