On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 11:43 +0100, Andy Wingo wrote: > I have two problems with it. One is that very few Schemers have used > it. I asked on this list once who had used it, and no one replied in > the affirmative. Therefore it is not "core" enough to go into a > "small" r7rs.
I must object to this. Firstly, I use raise-continuable all the time in various things that I do, and most of the exception systems that I have seen in Scheme have some equivalent form to this form. Moreover, the distinction between raise and raise-continuable is one that I have found useful in practice. -- Aaron W. Hsu | [email protected] | http://www.sacrideo.us לֵ֤ב חֲכָמִים֙ בְּבֵ֣ית אֵ֔בֶל וְלֵ֥ב כְּסִילִ֖ים בְּבֵ֥ית שִׂמְחָֽה׃ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
