The definition for <comment> has an issue when it follows a dot (".").
The definition includes 3 cases - simple comment, nested comment, and datum
comment.
comment = ";" *non-line-ending line-ending
/ nested-comment
/ "#;" datum
The datum comment when following a dot "eats" the next datum and thus is
improper.
I'd suggest to document this point or to correct the BNF definition with
special handling for dot.
thanks,
Joe N.
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
