On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Alaric Snell-Pym <[email protected]> wrote: > I hear the complaints from > people that our rejection of R6RS has been a mistake, but that was the > scope of the requirements laid down by the Steering Committee
Certainly the charter didn't *require* R6RS compatibility, but it didn't *prohibit* it. For example, the decisions not to make the module system or the error system or the struct system compatible were decisions that the working group took that could have gone the other way. Sam _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
