Oh, right, sorry about that, it is extraneous (my brain had an off-by-one section bug).
Regards, Andrew On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:07 PM, John Cowan <[email protected]> wrote: > Andrew Robbins scripsit: > > > No, this does not appear to be an error, the phrase "equal" seems to > > be referring to the "char=?" procedure, in which case it needs to be in > > that list, I do not think it should be removed. > > The reference is to the `string<?` procedure and friends. In strings, > unlike characters, the equality case is documented separately. > > -- > Mark Twain on Cecil Rhodes: John Cowan > I admire him, I freely admit it, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan > and when his time comes I shall [email protected] > buy a piece of the rope for a keepsake. >
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
