[email protected] scripsit: > The report seems good to me, but please note my very serious objection > to the semantics of identity of procedures. I hope that no system > makes significant use of that unnecessary freedom.
Unfortunately, this is not a formal vote; indeed, it's not clear if it's "yes" or "no". I can say that I will be filing a formal objection with the Steering Committee in the names of J. Cowan, G. Sussman, A. Shinn, J. Boyle, A. Hsu, A. Gleckler, A. Snell-Pym, U. T. Cobley and all. I should think that will be weighty enough to convince them to let us change the draft after the plebiscite. -- We do, doodley do, doodley do, doodley do, John Cowan <[email protected]> What we must, muddily must, muddily must, muddily must; Muddily do, muddily do, muddily do, muddily do, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Until we bust, bodily bust, bodily bust, bodily bust. --Bokonon _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
