On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 2:49 AM, John Cowan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Alexey writes: > > > [...] Perhaps change > > "Implementations are free to add other names." to "Implementations > > are free to add other names, so long as those names are not of the > > form x[a-fA-F0-9]+ , which would conflict with hex escapes." > > I believe Alexey's resolution is correct. Does any WG1 member disagree? > Does any member of the Scheme community disagree? Silence gives consent. > I see this is an editorial clarification of an implicit truth - we gave license to add escapes, but not to remove from the existing set of escapes. -- Alex
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
