On Tue 14 May 2013 15:35, John Cowan <[email protected]> writes:
> Please try to keep a grip on the fact that R7RS-small `let-syntax`, like > the R5RS version, is a scope rather than being spliced into the surrounding > scope. See ticket #48 and WG1Ballot2Results. That is a surprising change from R6RS that I had not noticed; thanks for pointing it out. The R6RS behavior made more sense to me, FWIW. (This process is causing me acute attacks of snark, so I do not wish to enter into a discussion about the change, however.) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
