Vassil Nikolov scripsit: > By the way, does Scheme have the notion of a potnum (or did it in > the past)?
No. But since Scheme has no standard way for programmers to alter the lexical syntax, it doesn't matter very much. Implementations are free to extend the syntax of numbers, extend the syntax of identifiers, or do neither. -- Even a refrigerator can conform to the XML John Cowan Infoset, as long as it has a door sticker [email protected] saying "No information items inside". http://www.ccil.org/~cowan --Eve Maler _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
