Vassil Nikolov scripsit: > (Common Lisp, and some other lisps, allow arbitrary functions to > be used to define macros, and it is entirely up to the programmer > to ensure that they don't "misbehave". Scheme introduces certain > restrictions and so assumes some of that responsibility.)
Unfortunately, a Common Lisp macro programmer cannot prevent misuse, no matter who cleverly their macros are written. At most they can only make it less likely. -- John Cowan [email protected] http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Is it not written, "That which is written, is written"? _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
