> > I think it does, though it was not intended to do so. The original purpose > was of course to prevent you from trying to import the same identifier > from different libraries. >
Thanks! > > And (replace <import set> (foo bar) (baz bar)) is supposed to introduce > two > > identifiers with the same binding? > > I see no reason why not, though no reason for a user to do that, either. > A reason could be that a program or library includes Scheme code using the `(include ...)` syntax and two included pieces of Scheme code expect different identifiers for the same binding. Marc
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
