Arthur A. Gleckler scripsit: > > 3) Should R7RS-large require support for exact complex numbers? > > Yes. > > > 4) Should R7RS-large require inexact complex numbers, to consist of > > pairs of 64-bit IEEE binary floats? > > No.
What's your rationale for this choice? Note that Alex has changed his vote on #3 to "no", and (as I have pointed out) systems with exact but not inexact complex numbers probably won't be attractive to those few users who actually need complex numbers. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [email protected] "Repeat this until 'update-mounts -v' shows no updates. You may well have to log in to particular machines, hunt down people who still have processes running, and kill them." _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
