Hi John! 25 maj 2014 kl. 23:38 skrev John Cowan <[email protected]>: > It extends to Gaussian integers (complex numbers whose real and imaginary > parts are both integers), but there is no support for those in Scheme > except as a subset of the general complex numbers.
OK, well, I thought exactness didn't matter given that R7RS explicitly provides "(lcm 32.0 -36) ==> 288.0" as an "inexact" example. So "32" and "32.0" are both fine, but "0.0+32.0i" is not (even though it is computable) because the "exact" version "0+32i" is not supported? (Odd, in my opinion.) > Writing a SRFI for Gaussian integers would be a Good Thing. How would that work, would you be able to elaborate? Many thanks, Fredrik _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
