Bear scripsit: > If someone presented a modified document which still claimed to > be the standard for Scheme while actually saying different things > about the semantics of the language described, that would clearly > be a violation of the license under which the original is offered, > because the original is intended for the use of the Scheme community > and such a document would actively undermine the Scheme community.
I don't agree. Since "the entire Scheme community" is not a body corporate, what is meant is that the document is for the use of the members of the community. After all, in the view of some, R7RS-small does exactly what you describe. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [email protected] Do what you will / this Life's a Fiction And is made up of / Contradiction. --William Blake _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
