Two new errata are available for R7RS-small:
17. In the first bullet of the "Incompatibilities with R6RS" section, for "have to be be" read "have to be". 18. In numeric tower bullet of the "Incompatibilities with R6RS" section, for "but the R6RS procedures real-valued?, rational-valued?, and integer-valued? were not" read "but the semantics of the R6RS procedures real?, rational?, and integer? were not adopted. (Note that the R5RS/R7RS semantics are available in R6RS using real-valued?, rational-valued?, and integer-valued?)". -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [email protected] Let's face it: software is crap. Feature-laden and bloated, written under tremendous time-pressure, often by incapable coders, using dangerous languages and inadequate tools, trying to connect to heaps of broken or obsolete protocols, implemented equally insufficiently, running on unpredictable hardware -- we are all more than used to brokenness. --Felix Winkelmann _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
