On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 05:17:03PM +0900, Alex Shinn wrote: > > For special optimization cases something like this library may be > > > useful, but I'd like to see it implemented and used for a while before > > > we decide whether it's good for general purpose code, and further > > > whether to standardize it. > > > > Agreed, but SRFIs are not standards. > > > > I was +1'ing Per's sentiment that this not be part of a standard. > >From the lists you're sending it to it would seem this is intended for R7RS > large.
You make a strong argument, and I would like to express my agreement. The duplication is too ugly to be standardized. I still believe the optional start/end argument stuff is a problem to be solved, but not in this way. Cheers, Peter -- http://www.more-magic.net _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
