Alex Shinn wrote: > None of SRFI 6, R6RS or R7RS specify what happens when you > call get-output-string on a string port which has been closed. > > John took a survey (http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/wiki/GetFromClosedStringPort) > and it looks like the de facto standard is that this "is an error." > I'm inclined to add an errata to that effect (similarly for > get-output-bytevector).
Please do. Reading from or writing to a closed port should always be an error. Will Clinger _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
