On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Shiro Kawai <[email protected]> wrote:
> (Oops, I only replied this to Alex. For the record, resending to > scheme-reports.) > > I'm in favor of this feature but I don't push this to be included in r7rs > errata. > I agree it's too big change, and it's best to leave it undefined for now > (or, an error in r7rs-sense). > I agree on both counts. This is not an oversight, not simply a mistake, and hence shouldn't be considered an erratum.
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
