* Ralph Giles ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:54 PM, David Flynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The only niggle i have with this file is that the EOS page has a bizare > > timestamp. imho, because there is no picture in the eos page, there is > > no meaningful time for it, so the granulepos should be -1 on the eos > > page on the dirac logical stream. > > ds and I talked about this a bit yesterday. The rfc says the special > value of 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF "indicates that no packets finish on that > page." So it's a bit misleading to say this. Moreover, it's convenient > for duration calculation (and scanning backward) if the final page has > a granulepos. With other mappings, when considering a non-frame eos > page, we've generally concluded it's better that it carry the same > granulepos as the last frame.
i'm happy to go with this. ..david ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ Schrodinger-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/schrodinger-devel
