On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:42:31PM +0000, [email protected] wrote:
> From: David Flynn <[email protected]>
> 
> Also removed the have_sequence_header flag, since it is identical
> to sequence_header_buffer != NULL;

I would prefer to use have_sequence_header, and not keep the sequence
header buffer around.  The latter is only used to do a bit-exact
match to subsequent sequence headers, which doesn't expand to everything
it needs to do.  For example, it doesn't handle comparing everything
except interlaced_coding.



dave...


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Schrodinger-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/schrodinger-devel

Reply via email to