On May 5, 2008, at 6:48 AM, Marcin Kasperski wrote: >>> The point of this file was to make it possible to build scid >>> in Linux "packaged" way, where binaries and data are not >>> installed together, but we use sth like /usr/bin/scid (or >>> /usr/games/scid) and /usr/share/scid/data/.... >> >> Given that books and bases directories are now user >> configurable, is it still useful to have this option ? > > IMO yes. It should be possible to compile scid with those > defaults - so if it is packaged, the user can run it succesfully > after installation. > Ah, sorry about that. The only reason I did it this way is that it seemed to accommodate the common case and I didn't want to go ripping into the configuration script. There needs to be a way to handle both cases but for OS X, it needs to be determined at runtime for the default to work after installation. I'll give it a thought.
Garth ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Scid-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
