On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 19:33 +0100, Alexander Wagner wrote: > Joost ´t Hart wrote: > > Hi! > > >> I'm not sure on what your request is, if its about exporting the > >> COMPILE/LINK variables to the engine's makefiles, I'm not sure how to > >> handle that. I could give it a try though, but I think it would be > >> better if someone who already knows how would volunteer to fix it. > > > > You are right, and from scid's makefile, invoking > > > > $(MAKE) CXX=$(COMPILE) > > > > instead of > > > > $(MAKE) > > > > would do the job. > > > > Having said that, it would probably be better if toga's makefile would > > have a separate LXX (or whatever) symbol to do the linking (as we speak, > > what to pass along if $(COMPILE) and $(LINK) happen _not_ to be the > > same?)... > > I think, you're entering areas here that should be fixed on togas end of > the line, not?
Probably, and as far as touching toga's makefile is concerned, yes. But: If so, why are toga's sources in our repository? Should they actually not be? And: Configure (absent) and make invocation _is_ this end of the line, is it not? > > BTW and OT: I'd rise another bug at Ubuntu. g++ should be a link to the > g++-binary you mentioned and just g++ would have to work. (Same for gcc, > gfortran, and so on, just in case.) > Agree (OT), just did :-) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Scid-users mailing list Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
