Hi!
First of all I think this is a useful new function, indeed.
Just tried it but I admit I'm a bit confused to how it
works.
Say I have the following:
1. e4 e5
(1... e6 )
(1... d6 )
(1... c5 )
I go to the beginning of the game, right, plays 1.e4.
Shouldn't now the arrows appear? I hit right, ah! There they
are, but e5 is not done. Right again. Now e5 is moved. This
is the intended behaviour? That is I've to hit right twice?
Secondly, this might be a bit specific for my CC usage.
Usually I've comments like:
1. e4 e6
(1... e6 2. d4)
(2... e6 2. d3)
(2... e6 2. Nf3)
simply cause I've always to add variations at the end of the
game, implying in Scid that I've to add a variation, redo
the opponents last move and then start with my analysis.
Would it be very difficult to notice that e6 (mainline) is
identical to e6 (first move in the variation) and that
therefore the interesting part starts a ply later and that
the arrows should actually reflect those parts? (Actually,
in this case even the above hitting of right twice would be
unnecessary. I think this is what confuses me in the first
place.)
--
Kind regards, / War is Peace.
| Freedom is Slavery.
Alexander Wagner | Ignorance is Strength.
|
| Theory : G. Orwell, "1984"
/ In practice: USA, since 2001
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
