Hi everyone,
I hope you're all doing well.
I'm writing to kindly request to be unsubscribed from the Scid-users mailing 
list. I've appreciated receiving the updates and discussions.
Thanks a lot!
Best regards,
Joseph Hamilton
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

On Wednesday, January 7, 2026, 9:12 PM, Alan Bennet via Scid-users 
<[email protected]> wrote:

Hi,

Happy New Year! Thanks to all Scid developers past and present for their 
efforts.

I use Scid for as much as possible. I would use it for just about 
everything if not for this:

On 1/7/26 10:34, Bahman Movaqar via Scid-users wrote:
> , dropping legacy or unused features, 

Please don't do that. To my mind legacy features are the best features. 
And there is nothing more frustrating than wanting a "new" feature in 
Scid, then researching online and finding that Scid "used to do that". 
If you don't want to maintain it, I can understand. Just leave it in. 
Maybe some future developer will pick it up and run with it.

A feature can be unused because nobody wants it. But I doubt that, 
because the effort was made in the first place... Did the earlier 
developers write code on a whim? More likely reasons why nobody uses the 
feature today: poor or non-existent documentation, poor discovery (e.g. 
removed from or never added to the menu), or idiosyncratic 
implementation (what the developer liked vs what the average user wants. 
I have in mind just about anything implemented by P.G.). Or here's a 
special case: I'm on Linux and the package maintainer excluded some 
dependencies, so some features simply don't work in the Scid from the 
repository. For example, Play / Tactical Game gives "Phalanx or Toga not 
found". Well, that's easy enough for me to work around, but not 
everybody would know how. Anyway I compiled a more recent version for 
.si5 support.

Just off the top of my head, below are some "unpopular" things I use 
Scid for. There are others, but you get the idea.
- .bin books, both displaying (book window) and editing (book tuning)
- .epd databases, have to use v4, wish it were still in v5
- .sso saved searches, absolutely NEED that on my ultraportable

At the moment I am really pining for a way in v5 to save searches for 
something other than material. I could do it in v4.5.2, and v5 can still 
load a saved search. I edit a template .sso by hand and it works, but 
the average user is never going to do that.

And the "find tactics" in Scid, what to say? I don't use it, because 
it's just badly done. But if it were well done, I definitely would use 
it. I train tactics using tChess Pro on my phone, but decent "find 
tactics" is top of my wish list for Scid.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
https://scid-users.narkive.com/rIGBhxTp/tactics

So, this won't find tactics which actually happened in the game
and without blunder on opponents part?
--
Michal Rudolf

        Post by Pascal Georges
        But my purpose is not to get all cases, just to be able
        to generate good tactical positions, suitable for
        training.

    Post by Michal Rudolf
    Sure, but getting as many good positions as possible is
    nice, as the search is slow anyway.

I agree but the few positions I got are interesting and
challenging enough. So it is highly feasible to get a 1000 games
base, which would need many days to be solved. That is enough
for me.

Pascal
-----------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
Alan



_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users



_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users

Reply via email to