Eyolf Østrem wrote: > With optimal, do you mean computationally or for the user?
Of course, I've meant the optimal search order for the user. From the computational point of view in this case it makes no significant difference how to search. > My hunch is that the depth-based search would be closer to what the user > would need: a changed move-order is a minor deviation, whereas the order > or variations is - possibly - a fairly random criterion. Ok, you are proposing method (a). Anyone who is preferring method (b)? In fact I've implemented method (b) in the new database version, but probably I will change it to (a). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y _______________________________________________ Scidb-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scidb-users
