Some of our earth science friends might find this interesting and alarming.

-ML


As schools reduce role of earth sciences, some fear risk to key fields

10/02/2001

By JOSHUA BENTON / The Dallas Morning News

---------------------
CHANGES ADD UP The diminished emphasis on earth science in Texas schools
resulted from the convergence of several small changes:

€ Until recently, most science classes before high school focused on a
specific field. For example, seventh-graders usually studied life science
and eighth-graders took earth science. In 1998, Texas adopted a new
curriculum, which replaced those courses with broad-based "general science"
classes. That eliminated the earth science focus in the third, fifth, and
eighth grades. 

€ Last year, the State Board of Education changed a long-standing rule that
had allowed high school students to take earth science as one of their
graduation requirements. Starting with this year's freshmen, students must
use biology, chemistry, and physics classes to meet the requirement. Earth
science became an elective.

€ When Texas' new generation of standardized tests is introduced in 2003,
students won't be tested on earth science after fifth grade. The current
test for eighth-graders is being replaced with a fifth-grade test.
----------------------


As much as any state, Texas has prospered from the bounty of the earth. Oil
and gas have built staggering fortunes and shining skylines.

But a group of geologists, academics, and corporate executives is arguing
that the state is risking its future prosperity by letting its schools'
commitment to the earth sciences erode.

"If you don't get kids exposed to these things in the classroom, how are
they going to learn?" said Jon L. Thompson, president of Exxon Mobil
Exploration Co. and one of dozens lobbying officials to strengthen the
state's commitment to the field.

State officials acknowledge that a series of recent decisions has helped to
move earth science to the margins. But they say it's the unintended
consequence of well-meaning reforms.

"The unfortunate net result is that earth science has become something we
never meant it to be, which is essentially ignored," said Chris
Castillo-Comer, director of science in the Texas Education Agency's division
of curriculum and professional develop- ment.

Ms. Castillo-Comer and advocates for earth science say the root causes for
the shift are several converging changes in the past few years.

Among them is the state's new curriculum, adopted in 1998, which eliminated
focused study of earth science in third, fifth, and eighth grades as part of
a shift toward broader "general science" classes that touch on each field of
science in every grade.

The Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills, which will replace the TAAS
testing system in 2003, also replaces the eighth-grade science test with a
fifth-grade test. The change was made to ease the load on eighth-graders,
who will take three other tests in the new regimen.

And last year, the State Board of Education changed a rule that allowed high
school students to take earth science to fulfill science requirements.
Officials want to be sure all students study biology, chemistry and physics.
Starting with freshmen this fall, earth science counts only as an elective.

Add all those changes up, and the place for earth science ­ the study of
rocks, lakes, volcanoes, and other things terrestrial ­ is shrinking.

Some schools still offer earth science classes as electives, but Ms.
Castillo-Comer said few students take them if they can't be counted toward
science graduation requirements. Fewer than a quarter of Texas high schools
even offer an elective in geology, meteorology, and oceanography, the main
earth science high school course approved by the state, she said. It's too
soon to tell how the changes have affected class enrollments.

"The result of this is that earth science is going to be just a middle
school subject in Texas," said Mike Smith, director of education for the
American Geological Institute, which has been coordinating the lobbying
efforts in Texas. "Kids may learn earth science as 11- or 12-year-olds and
never encounter the subject again."

He said that, if there is a national trend in earth science education, it's
to increase its presence in the curriculum as environmental and energy
issues become more important. For example, North Carolina made high school
earth science a required course for graduation last year. The National
Science Education Standards, produced by the National Research Council in
1996, includes earth science in its standards at each grade through senior
year. 

"These people are going to be voters someday, and they need to know
something about the earth, the water, the soil, the environment if they're
going to understand the issues they'll be facing," said Edward Roy, a
professor of geology at Trinity University in San Antonio and chair of AGI's
education advisory committee.

More than a dozen oil company executives have written letters or made phone
calls criticizing the move away from earth science in Texas, a state with
more working geologists than any other. "It's difficult to imagine that a
state that's benefited so much from the bounty of the earth and should be so
concerned about the future would neglect this part of education," said
Robert Stern, who heads the geosciences department at the University of
Texas at Dallas. 

Grace Shore, the State Board of Education chairwoman, said she has gotten 40
to 50 letters on the subject in recent months ­ "more than I've received on
any other curriculum item." She said she's sympathetic to their concerns.

"We have a very narrow focus in our science curriculum," she said. "I would
like to see more courses counted for science credit."

But she said the state must keep that narrow focus in order to have a
sensible testing system. If high school students are going to be tested in a
subject area, they need to take the classes necessary to prepare them for
that test. 

All Texas students are required to take biology and at least an integrated
course in chemistry and physics; as a result, officials say, all students
can be fairly tested on those subjects. Let some students take earth science
instead of chemistry, they say, and the integrity of the test could be
compromised. "We can't test everything," Ms. Shore said.

As a result, she said, earth science probably won't be used for science
credit unless the science requirement is expanded from two to three credits,
something that Ms. Shore supports but probably would take several years to
accomplish. 

"You get back to the old problem of how many hours are there in the day?"
she said. 

Until larger changes can be made, Ms. Castillo-Comer ­ herself a former
earth science teacher ­ and others are trying to find smaller ways to bring
the field back to prominence. While earth science objectives will not be
tested on the exit-level Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills, Ms.
Castillo-Comer said officials will try to include some questions that use
earth science settings to deal with concepts of biology, chemistry or
physics. 

"I know the importance of earth science in making sure that our kids connect
back to the earth, especially in our huge urban schools," Ms. Castillo-Comer
said. "It's been very difficult, and everyone is concerned. But we're not
going to lose it entirely. We just have to keep working at it." 


--
This is the CPS Science Teacher List.

To unsubscribe, send a message to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

For more information:
<http://home.sprintmail.com/~mikelach/subscribe.html>.

To search the archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/science%40lists.csi.cps.k12.il.us/>

Reply via email to