s/dns/systemd/g and get the same debate, imo On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:09 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia <nka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Jamie Duncan <jamie.e.dun...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Rhel won't change package management tools mid release, and they > shouldn't. > > > > Rhel 8 will likely use dnf. > > And retain yum for compatibility It still relias on the same > fundamentally over-engineered upstreadm repository metadata, it's > mostly compatible with yum except at the unpredictable moments when it > is not, and it still can't do an uniinstallation of one package and an > installation of another package in the same step to manage common > dependencies for packages like "sendmail" vs. postfix, Java version > migrations, and "mysql-libs" changes between MaradDB, Percona MySQL, > community MySQL, and others. > > I'm afraid that dnf added features that break things and didn't > actually solve any of the already existing, long-standing problems. > I'm quite upset with it: it's now breaking SL 6 and SL 7 hosted builds > using mock for the most recent Fedora. >
