On 06/17/2016 11:45 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
On 06/17/2016 04:40 PM, Andrew Z wrote:
I understand it is very lame to refer to a technical article on
cio.com <http://cio.com>. and yet I'll try :)
http://www.cio.com/article/3085079/linux/goodbye-rpm-and-deb-hello-snaps.html
I never heard of it and just wonder how much of real value is in this
new system.
Related LWN : http://lwn.net/Articles/691309/
https://www.happyassassin.net/2016/06/16/on-snappy-and-flatpak-business-as-usual-in-the-canonical-propaganda-department/
A good post giving a little bit of context for the actual snapy adoption
by other distributions. The pres release from canonical is a bit over
enthusiastic about adoption, security and how well received snapy is by
others.
best Max
