I trust that you mean "yum clean all".
-----Original message-----
> From:jdow <j...@earthlink.net>
> Sent: Monday 30th January 2017 11:34
> To: scientific-linux-users@fnal.gov
> Subject: Re: Anacron has an upset tummy over sl-security
>
> I am not using a local repo. I'm trying a "repo clean all" and then an update.
>
> {^_^}
>
> On 2017-01-29 16:15, Bill Maidment wrote:
> > Hi
> > I got the same issue, but when I deleted repodata from my local repo and
> > resynced from the rsync master, it sorted itself out.
> > I believe this may have been caused by the firefox update which was
> > released about the same time as 7.3
> > Anyway, I no longer have the problem (for now).
> >
> > Cheers
> > Bill
> >
> >
> > -----Original message-----
> >> From:jdow <j...@earthlink.net>
> >> Sent: Monday 30th January 2017 10:30
> >> To: scientific-linux-users@fnal.gov
> >> Subject: Anacron has an upset tummy over sl-security
> >>
> >> /etc/cron.daily/0yum-daily.cron:
> >>
> >> Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we have:
> >> Current : Wed Jan 25 11:54:42 2017
> >> Downloaded: Wed Jan 25 11:54:25 2017
> >> Update notice SLBA-2015:2562-1 (from sl-security) is broken, or a bad
> >> duplicate,
> >> skipping.
> >> You should report this problem to the owner of the sl-security repository.
> >> Update notice SLBA-2016:1445-1 (from sl-security) is broken, or a bad
> >> duplicate,
> >> skipping.
> >> Update notice SLBA-2016:1526-1 (from sl-security) is broken, or a bad
> >> duplicate,
> >> skipping.
> >> ... many more
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I thought this was supposed to be fixed. This suggests there still is some
> >> form
> >> of problem with the sl-security repo.
> >>
> >> {^_^} Joanne
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
