This particular email was sent to the errata list, but the reply-to
header is set to the users lists...
On 06/21/2017 02:47 AM, Bill Maidment wrote:
Aha.
Thanks for that. How many mailing lists do we need???
I got confused (not difficult at my age) as the response came on the User list.
Anyway, I echo the response. The team always seems to be on top of security
issues.
Thank you (and the community) for being so friendly and helpful.
Cheers
Bill
-----Original message-----
From:Hans Kristian Rosbach <ha...@raskesider.no>
Sent: Wednesday 21st June 2017 17:30
To: Bill Maidment <b...@maidment.me>; scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov
Subject: Re: Security ERRATA Important: kernel on SL6.x i386/x86_64
I think that mail came from the
scientific-linux-err...@listserv.fnal.gov list, so you might
have been removed from that list for some reason, but not from the users
list for example.
--
Hans Kristian Rosbach
Servebolt.com / Raske Sider
On 06/21/2017 12:41 AM, Bill Maidment wrote:
Hi. Is there something wrong with this mailing list? I received this response,
but I never received the original message. This is not the first time I have
noticed this.
Cheers
Bill
-----Original message-----
From:Stephan Wiesand <stephan.wies...@desy.de>
Sent: Wednesday 21st June 2017 2:58
To: scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov
Subject: Re: Security ERRATA Important: kernel on SL6.x i386/x86_64
Kudos to the SL team at FNAL for once again getting the updates for a really
nasty issue out incredibly quickly. Impressive.
--
Stephan Wiesand
DESY -DV-
Platanenenallee 6
15738 Zeuthen, Germany
