On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Troy Dawson <daw...@fnal.gov> wrote: > Hi Steve, > Sorry for not getting back to this. > I think it looks ok. I am goign to put it into contrib first. > For SL5 I think we can get it into the full release. > For SL4, I'd rather not. I'd rather leave it in the contrib area. > SL4 at *some* point is going to go into legacy mode, and I'd like to keep > the added packages down.
That would be great, I'm not that bothered about 4 just did it since I could basically. > > Troy > > Steve Traylen wrote: >> >> any comment? >> >> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Steve Traylen <steve.tray...@cern.ch> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've users who wish to have gnuplot42 on SL5 (and4) >>> >>> These are some packages here I've done: >>> >>> http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/gnuplot42/ >>> >>> which are designed to not interfere with the existing gnuplot packages >>> present in SL4/5. >>> >>> I do have an open review here for EPEL: >>> >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570318 >>> >>> but due to lack of interest I guess it is not progressing. >>> If it does progress I'll bump to higher release version in EPEL >>> than in SL and advise SL of its redundancy in SL. >>> >>> Please consider gnuplot42 inclusion into SL. >>> >>> Steve >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Steve Traylen >>> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > __________________________________________________ > Troy Dawson daw...@fnal.gov (630)840-6468 > Fermilab ComputingDivision/LSCS/CSI/USS Group > __________________________________________________ > -- Steve Traylen