Look at "Legal Questions about Scientific Linux" FAQ: https://www.scientificlinux.org/documentation/faq/legal
12/05/2011 16:20 +0200, Miguel Angel Diaz wrote: > Hi. > > I agree with you that packages have their own licenses. > > But my question follows in other way. Imagine I want to create > other .iso based on S.L.iso. I need to read .iso license to know if I am > doing well. > > Regards. > > > > > El jue, 12-05-2011 a las 14:32 +0200, Frank Lanitz escribió: > > Am 12.05.2011 13:53, schrieb Miguel Angel Diaz: > > > For each package there is a license, but it should exist a license for > > > SL. > > > > > > For example, in Centos you can find a file (GPU.txt or EULA.txt) in a > > > mirror http://centos.arcticnetwork.ca/5.5/os/x86_64/ . These files show > > > version of GPL license. > > > > > > Did anyone find these files to SL ? > > > > Its just not possible IMHO to bundle the iso with one and only license. > > I'd suggest to check the license of each package or go deeper into > > detail, why you need this information at all. > > > > Cheers, > > Frank