Am Montag, 19. September 2011, 18:46:25 schrieben Sie: > Am Montag, 19. September 2011, 09:56:47 schrieb Pat Riehecky: > > Adding it shouldn't be too much work, but from the distribution side we > > don't want to force all our users to run a "sending only" mail server > > (or more) unless they actually want to. I might instead add a check in > > the script where, if sending mail doesn't look possible, it simply > > doesn't try to send it. That way people don't have to worry about > > surprise software installation on their next update. I know I'd freak > > out if suddenly my system is running sendmail/postfix when it wasn't > > before. > It does not seem that mailx requires sendmail/postfix (says "rpm -qR > mailx"). So adding the dependency should be safe. Has this info I gave been considerd? Has anything been decided on this issue, yet?
--Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
