On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:53 AM, zxq9 <z...@zxq9.com> wrote: > On 04/24/2012 11:58 PM, g wrote: >> >> >> On 04/24/2012 11:02 AM, zxq9 wrote: >>> >>> From a question on the Japanese mailing list: >>> >>> TUV is committing to a 10 year production lifecycle for 5 and 6. CentOS >>> has now reflected this on their project's lifecycle page. Scientific >>> Linux does not match this. >> >> >> in a previous post from Connie Sieh; >> >> ++++++++ >> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:20:13 -0500 >> From: "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 (Santiago) discussion mailing-list" >> <rhelv6-l...@redhat.com> >> To: rhelv6-l...@redhat.com >> Subject: [rhelv6-list] Announcement: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Life Cycle >> Extended to Ten Years >> >> Today Red Hat is pleased to announce that it has extended the life cycle >> of >> Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5, 6 and future releases from seven to 10 years, >> effective immediately. This announcement is in response to the widespread >> adoption of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 since its introduction in 2007, and >> the increasing rate of adoption of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 since its >> launch in 2010. >> ++++++++ >> >> hth. > > > I take that to mean that SL is similarly extended, then. I suppose the > project page just hasn't been updated to reflect this. > > Thanks for finding that.
My understanding is that it was a simple forward of the TUV announcement and that SL has not made an official statement about the plan. But I could be wrong. :( Akemi
