On Tue, 16 Jul 2013, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
Sure you can for the most part where do you think scientific linux came
from.
But you don't need a license to get them they are all on Red Hat's public
FTP server along with all the other SRPMS for every other free speech or
open source piece of software they support. Really the FTP site is the safe
bet for that because they won't post SRPM's for any proprietary code on
their public FTP server but the ones you get off of access.redhat.com may
include proprietary code.
The BETA SRPMS are NOT on Red Hat's public FTP server.
I am not a lawyer so this is only a opinion and not legal advice. I do
NOT think you can redistribute the result since you obtained the SRPM via
"RHN" and not via the public ftp server.
-Connie Sieh
-- Sent from my HP Pre3
____________________________________________________________________________
On Jul 16, 2013 13:58, Yi Ding <yi.s.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
This isn't devtoolset specific, but if someone were to get the SRPMs for
devtoolset-2 Beta (by using a RHEL license), and were to recompile them
would they be able to redistribute them?
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Connie Sieh <cs...@fnal.gov> wrote:
On Tue, 14 May 2013, Graham Allan wrote:
Thanks, this is wonderful! I wonder how I managed to
miss that?
I forgot to announce it. Will do so soon. In class this week.
-Connie Sieh
Graham
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:07:33PM -0500, Pat Riehecky
wrote:
The Scientific Linux build is available at:
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6x/external_products/devtoo
lset/
Pat
On 05/14/2013 12:04 PM, Graham Allan wrote:
I was just wondering if this ever
went anywhere? Obviously I
appreciate the "no promises" part
:-) Was it too much of a
nightmare to build?
I saw that CentOS got to the stage
of having a test build
available
(http://people.centos.org/tru/devtools/)
though I
haven't looked at it.
Graham
On 9/17/2012 9:50 AM, Yi Ding
wrote:
Awesome. This should
be really useful for
us (finally a modern
era
compiler on RHEL
supported by Redhat).
Let me know if you
want any
beta testers.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012
at 4:59 PM, Connie
Sieh <cs...@fnal.gov>
wrote:
On Wed, 12
Sep 2012,
Patrick J.
LoPresti
wrote:
Red
Hat
has
released
a
compilation
environment
supporting
C++11
as
part
of
the
"Red
Hat
Developer
Toolset"
for
RHEL
6.x:
https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/Red_Hat_Developer_Toolset/
I
am
curious
to
know
whether
anybody
has
recompiled
this
for
Scientific
Linux,
whether
anybody
has
an
interest
in
doing
so,
etc.
I have.
Working
on
releasing
it. It is
a bit more
complicated
to compile
than the
standard
SL. Have
to modify
the build
system to
handle it.
No
promises
of course
(disclaimer).