On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:59:08AM -0500, Paul Robert Marino wrote: > You have to download the RPM's from Glusters yum repos. > They purposely removed it from EPEL because the Gluster 3.4 client is > now included in RHEL and the server version which was in EPEL was too > old to work with the client included with RHEL, > http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/ > you have to pick the right repo for the version you want for example 3.4 is > here > http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.4/3.4.0/RHEL/epel-6/x86_64/ > > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Peter van Hooft > <ho...@natlab.research.philips.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:05:02AM -0600, Pat Riehecky wrote: > >> On 12/10/2013 02:53 AM, Peter van Hooft wrote: > >> >Hi, > >> > > >> >When updating my 6.4 system, glusterfs release 3.4.0.36rhs-1 was > >> >available from sl-security. > >> >However, since I had glusterfs-server 3.2.7-1 from EPEL installed, the > >> >update failed since > >> >glusterfs-server 3.4.0.36rhs-1 from SL6 is not available. > >> >Does anyone have an idea when this package will be published? Do I have > >> >to wait for SL6.5? > >> > > >> >Regards, > >> > > >> >Peter van Hooft > >> > >> I'm afraid the glusterfs-server package is not in SL 6. > >> > >> I've only got > >> glusterfs-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm > >> glusterfs-api-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm > >> glusterfs-api-devel-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm > >> glusterfs-devel-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm > >> glusterfs-fuse-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm > >> glusterfs-libs-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm > >> glusterfs-rdma-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm > >> > >> The upstream announcement (BA-2013-1641) does not list the server > >> package either. > >> > >> Pat > >> > >> -- > >> Pat Riehecky > >> > >> Scientific Linux developer > >> http://www.scientificlinux.org/ > >> > >> > > > > I downloaded the source rpm and rebuilt it with --with server > > The glusterfs-server package gets built nicely. > > I couldn't find any references to why SL6 don't offer it though, except > > for a discussion on EPEL if they would drop *their* glusterfs packages. > > The SL6 glusterfs packages on the other hand (to be precise: the > > glusterfs-api > > package) are needed for other package upgrades. > > > > Peter >
I believe RedHat doesn't offer glusterfs-server because they made that into a layered product for their storage appliance. But why can't SL offer it? I'll discuss moving to the glusterfs.org repos with the team here. Thanks all. Peter
