Thanks, Pat, but would that be significant enough to impact future releases?
Peter -----Original Message----- From: Pat Riehecky [mailto:riehe...@fnal.gov] Sent: 06 June 2014 15:21 To: Chiu, Peter (STFC,RAL,RALSP); SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV Subject: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] News on Scientific Linux The folks over at CentOS are planning to host the RHEL source in a set of git repos. The long term future of source rpms on ftp.redhat.com is somewhat fluid right now. Pat On 06/06/2014 09:14 AM, Peter C. Chiu wrote: > An indirect news from a colleague, hence I am seeking for more creditable > clarification from this group. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Berg (Contractor) > [mailto:stephen.berg....@nrlssc.navy.mil] > Sent: 06 June 2014 15:11 > To: SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV > Subject: Re: News on Scientific Linux > > On 06/06/2014 09:08 AM, peter.c...@stfc.ac.uk wrote: >> I have heard of some rather upsetting news that "Scientific Linux >> will likely to be dropped soon as RHEL aren't planning to release source >> rpms outside the RHEL customers - only source tar balls". >> >> Not sure if the change on source makes any difference to the Sc Linux >> development team. >> >> But I shall be grateful if someone please confirm or deny this news. >> >> Many thanks. >> >> Peter > What's your source for that information? > > -- > Stephen Berg > Systems Administrator > NRL Code: 7320 > Office: 228-688-5738 > stephen.berg....@nrlssc.navy.mil -- Pat Riehecky Scientific Linux developer http://www.scientificlinux.org/ -- Scanned by iCritical.
