Interesting concept. Now tell me what happens if a random EM pulse happens 
anywhere within a hundred miles of this "electronic kilogram". Never mind, I 
will. NO "electronic kilogram". Sometimes we scientists can get ahead of 
ourselves in the cause of science.

Amy Harlib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just plain fascinating.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

October 16, 2005
Measuring the World: From Material to Ethereal 
By KENNETH CHANG
LOCKED in a vault in Paris is a cylinder about the size of a plum. Its mass is 
exactly one kilogram. It is the kilogram.

For 116 years, this cylinder made of platinum and iridium has been the world's 
defining unit of mass. It's an easy concept to understand. 

Scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology in 
Gaithersburg, Md., announced last month significant progress toward supplanting 
this cylinder. Their concept is not so easy to understand.

It's a two-story-tall contraption that looks one part Star Trek, one part 
Wallace and Gromit. Briefly put, it measures the power needed to generate an 
electromagnetic force that balances the gravitational pull on a kilogram of 
mass.

"It's such a very complicated thing that's hard to explain," said Richard 
Steiner, the physicist in charge of the project. He has been working on this 
"electronic kilogram" machine for more than a decade.

"That's what everybody kind of laughs at," Dr. Steiner said. "They're all 
impressed it's such a complicated thing and then they ask, 'What do you need it 
for?' "

The general answer is that humans have always needed to quantify and 
standardize, to make their world more certain. Without a standard kilogram - 
roughly 2.2 pounds - how would scientists know their measurements of mass were 
accurate? Without a standard meter, how would a manufacturer make a ruler and 
know that it is precise?

More specifically, the high-tech kilogram is needed because scientists prefer a 
definition based on the universal constants of physics - something they could 
in principle calibrate in their own laboratories - rather than on an artifact 
sitting in a distant vault. 

Another problem with the kilogram cylinder is that it is not necessarily 
unchanging. Over time, contamination might add smidgeons of mass, or cleaning 
might scrub away some atoms, leaving a lesser kilogram. Better, scientists say, 
not to have to worry about dust, dirt or disaster striking the Paris vault.

The kilogram, in fact, is decades behind the meter, which used to be defined as 
the distance between two scratches on a metal bar. In 1960, scientists defined 
the meter in terms of the wavelength of a specific orange light emitted by 
krypton atoms. In 1983, they redefined the speed of light to be exactly 
299,792,458 meters per second, so a meter is now just the distance that light 
travels in a vacuum in 1/299,792,458th of a second.

The newer definitions hark back to the original metric definitions, which were 
based on features of the natural world, not human artifacts. A kilogram was the 
mass of water filling a cube that is one-tenth of a meter on each side, or one 
liter of volume, and a meter was one ten-millionth of the distance from the 
North Pole to the Equator, along the path passing through Paris (since it was 
the French Academy of Sciences that defined the meter).

Neither definition proved practical, and the French scientists botched their 
calculation of how much the Earth is squashed by the centrifugal force of its 
rotation, so the metal bar they made to represent a meter was off by a fraction 
of a millimeter.

It is also not easy to measure precisely a liter of pure water, which is 
complicated by impurities and gases dissolved in the water and by how water 
density changes with temperature and pressure. Instead, that platinum-iridium 
cylinder was established as the official definition, in 1889.

The search for standards began with the rise of civilization. Measures were 
needed, especially for commerce. At first, people simply used parts of the 
body. A cubit, for example, was the distance from the elbow to the tip of the 
middle finger - which differed from person to person, until an Egyptian pharaoh 
declared a cubit to be the distance from his elbow to the tip of his middle 
finger (and possibly the width of his palm). 

It was hardly convenient to borrow the pharaoh's arm to measure a bolt of 
cloth, so a piece of granite was carved and declared the official cubit. Other 
people would make their own cubit rulers, usually out of wood, based on the 
granite standard. 

The same idea underlay the standards for the kilogram and the meter - a 
cylinder and a bar, respectively. "Those were not bad standards at the time," 
said John L. Hall, a scientist at the Institute of Standards and Technology and 
a winner of this year's Nobel Prize in Physics, who helped refine the 
definition of the meter two decades ago. "But they're kind of hard to duplicate 
and disseminate."

Dr. Steiner's team with its two-story contraption has now fixed the mass of a 
kilogram to 99.999995 percent accuracy. To satisfy the international body that 
sets measurement standards, they probably need to raise that last "5" to an 
"8." 

As science measures ever tinier bits of the universe, measurement must become 
more precise. If scientists can define units in terms of constants like the 
speed of light and the charge of the electron, then they can better study 
whether constants really are constant. "It's a much more serious question than 
it appears to be," Dr. Hall said.



  a.. Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company 
  b.. 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



SPONSORED LINKS 
Science fiction and fantasy Genre magazine 

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 


    Visit your group "scifinoir2" on the web.
  
    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 


---------------------------------





"Excuse me while I whip this out."
                    Cleavon Little , "Blazing Saddles"
                
---------------------------------
 Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/LRMolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Reply via email to